Category Archives: law

Ahh, Civility.

screen-shot-2017-01-26-at-3-46-09-pm

…its not ego if construction begins.  And why is Mexico so adamant against a “wall”?

Its really not all that expensive, or difficult to build.   Someone has to pay for it, and its not unreasonable to look to Mexico to contribute.

Illegal immigrants crossing that border – illegally – are not the best and brightest.  Many are unable to work, and many end up being supported by us, essentially.   There are drugs and criminals crossing that border.   That’s a fact.

The US is, a sovereign, just like Mexico.   We have every reason to support and expect a “wall”, together with immigration reform.

President Trump’s wall is a statement to the world: This is our country. We decide who comes here. And we will defend our borders.

Esteban Santiago.

ruiez-3So, lessee, two months before flying from wherever to Florida, checking a firearm (which thousands of law-abiding people do, every month/day), and then shooting up an airport, this guy was telling the FBI that he was delusional, hearing voices, and was going to “fight for isis.”  And had an apparent history of domestic violence?  Really?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2554152/fort-lauderdale-airport-shooting-florida-latest-updates/

http://www.freep.com/story/news/2017/01/06/airport-shooter-isil-mind-control/96268492/

Some say that government is full of bureaucratic incompetents.  I’m inclined to agree.

Who’s Laughing.

2844233_orig

From Weaselzippers.com, Feralirishman and posted many other places, I actually watched this video and laughed at the irony.

Of course, Trump was also roasted at the Annual WH Correspondent’s Dinner:

Yes, who’s laughing now.  I wonder though:  There is talk that the left could tinker with the electoral college.  We’ve all seen that talk, but for those who haven’t, here are some opinions/thoughts:

Faithless Electors Switching to Hillary: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/how-faithless-electors-are-messing-with-our-electoral-maps-explained/

http://starvingthemonkeys.com/2016/11/12/the-final-veil-hs-falling/

http://christianmerc.blogspot.com/2016/11/blue-island-people-want-your-republic.html

Likely?  I donno.  Its never been done before where it made a difference.  Concerning?  Again, never been done before where it made a difference.   There are some really good reasons why it wouldn’t happen.   But some were kicking this idea around mere months ago.  And now, we know what votes in the college are – the numbers are in.  The left knows the score and they are trying to play the game.

One thought, perhaps irrelevant, perhaps not, from rt.com:

…instead of debating and engaging with people, a huge chunk of Hillary supporters decided anyone who didn’t agree with them was a racist, sexist, uneducated waste of oxygen. In fact, their own candidate even appeared to back them up in this line of thinking by calling Trump supporters “deplorables.”

And of course, they mocked Trump.  Now, some threaten and riot.  The corollary, I suppose, is that if the left is that biased, that unyielding, that – desperate – is an unfaithful electorate all that outside the realm?  Pile on unfavorable biased media, multitudes of civil suits pending against Trump, days upon days of riots that may cause some to question their choice, allegations that Trump cozied up to the Russians or establishment Republicans who held their noses.  Lump it all together with whatever.  Could that make any difference?

I’m going to guess it won’t happen.   Thankfully.

But the pundits, the press, Obama – they didn’t think we would have a President-Elect Trump, did they?

Liberal Crybabies.

201410_2207_aeahi_smAnd this, this is why we can’t have nice things.

…others have said, “…hey, gee, remember when Romney or McCain supporters went out in 2008 and 2012 and rioted – oh wait, not so much.”  So true.  And for good reason.

real-fighter-minimum-wageProfessional protestors, “Snowflake” students, Black Lives Matter, MoveOn.org or just general do-nothing anarchists – I don’t care.  What I do care about is that these people, whomever they are, need to be called out properly by the liberal and mainstream media.  The same media that is biased, uninformed, and not as smart as they think.  Dumb-guy1

Hillary lost because of a lot of reasons, chief among them, she’s an outright liar – her email server, selling US interests off to foreign governments through her Foundation, having one “public” position on any number of issues and another “private” position and on and on.   It was her fooling any number of demographic population centers and everybody else voting Trump.   That’s the only thing that got her the popular vote – barely.

Trump won because he appealed to the common man.   Because Hillary’s faults were like a scab that repeatedly got ripped off, leaving who she really is laid bare in angry flesh and pus – an old, conniving, thieving, corrupt dinosaur.

sick-hillaryOne worrisome thing though – Trump will be president, but you can expect the media, establishment politicians (Republican’s included), and those same population centers – stuffed full of those with some false sense of entitlement, democrats who have been sold false promises by a corrupt media and their own leaders, to continue their “fight.”

Trumps going to have his hands full.   And that’s whats wrong with this Country.

cw-uelfweaaoud6

Nothing to See Here…. .

see_no_evil_hear_no_evil_speak_no_evilSuppose we read with great interest all the under-handed, back room dealing, conniving, cheating, pay for play scandals and learn about how honest and noble our representatives are…or were.

CNN said we, the little people, would be subject to arrest, as “…only the media can read this material…”.

Yeah, that would be something.

https://wikileaks.org/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/cnn-attempts-scare-viewers-says-illegal-read-wikileaks-podesta-emails-video/

CNN: It Is Illegal For Voters To Possess Wikileaks Material

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/16/cnn-host-claims-its-illegal-for-public-to-view-wikileaks-emails-video/

Its the Toddlers!

the-map2Good grief.   What a bunch BS…. .

http://toddlerskill.org/

Keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people saves lives. And expanding Brady background checks to every sale is the best way to stop dangerous felons, domestic abusers, fugitives, and terrorists from buying guns.

Howzat, exactly?

http://freebeacon.com/issues/gun-control-group-toddler-campaign-pads-stats-with-adult-deaths/

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/20/if-clinton-wins-america-kiss-your-right-to-self-defense-good-bye.html

Face the Dock.

GettyImages-159924056-hillary-glasses-2-640x480Yes, that is a fair question…. .

On Thursday, when federal prosecutors announced charges against Martin under the Espionage Act for mishandling classified documents, people wondered, “but what about Hillary Clinton?” 

In principle, both did the same thing. Martin, as a National Security Agency contractor, stored classified documents in his home, which was unauthorized. Clinton, as Secretary of State, stored classified documents on her personal server in her home.  Again, unauthorized. On its face, it seems pretty much the same. 

Legally, the big difference is this: Martin admitted he knew the documents were classified and admitted that what he did was wrong and illegal.  Game over.

He should have “lawyered up” before opening his mouth.  Or consulted Clinton.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/21/gregg-jarrett-why-is-legal-standard-for-hillary-different-than-one-for-and-me.html

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161020/17313435848/how-could-nsa-contractor-harold-martin-have-been-taking-home-classified-info-20-years-without-nsa-noticing.shtml

….and this, in the context of recent polling that suggests that Clinton SHOULD have been indicted…. .

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/most_still_say_clinton_should_have_been_indicted

Something to be said for keeping your mouth shut.  Some can do it, and some cannot.  And its important.