M855 Not “Armor Piercing.”

1000rd-case-m855-lake-city-green-tip-5-56-bulk-ammo-62gr-am556lc-02-800x533…Much has been written about the pending “rule-change” and I thought I’d make the point:  The BATFE proposes changes to the definition of “armor piercing” because as Eric Holder demonstrates, when things are too hard, simply change the rules to suit your own agenda.

Bsiw4RWCYAEBFK_It goes without saying, there are no violent wrong-doers running around with short-barreled rifles or hand-guns chambered with this round.  Even if there were, “rule changes” would not deter.

And once again stating the obvious, soft body armor will not reliably stop any centerfire round.  Wait, what?!

“Oh, but we allowed the public a period of comment, just to be fair.”  How nice.  That’s really thoughtful.  atfFor what its worth:

https://www.nraila.org/take-action/write-your-lawmakers/

More:

http://www.infowars.com/ar-15-ammo-not-armor-piercing-according-to-law-but-atf-banning-it-anyway/

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2560750

http://silveristhenew.com/2015/02/26/the-war-on-preppers-obama-bans-ammo-for-the-most-popular-rifle-in-america/

http://georgiacarry.com/national/M855_ammo/Comments_of_GCO.pdf

Advertisements

One thought on “M855 Not “Armor Piercing.””

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s